PDA

View Full Version : Re-election? You make the call.


S...
02-07-2003, 12:01 PM
Bush’s Midterm: One For the Record Books
Firsts and Worsts from His First Two Years in Office

FIRST: Bush Produced First Budget Deficit Since 1997.
In FY2002, thanks largely to Bush’s tax cuts, the federal government posted its first budget deficit since 1997.

FIRST: Bush is First President to Lose Jobs on a Monthly Basis in the Last 60 Years.
Bush is the first president since Harry Truman took office to lose jobs on an average monthly basis. Through Bush’s first two years in office, the economy has shed an average of 73,000 jobs per month. No other president has had averaged monthly job losses in office since the Labor Department began keeping records in 1939.

FIRST: Under Bush, Income Fell for First Time in 10 Years.
In 2001, the real median household income fell—from $43,162 to $42,228—for the first time since 1991. Median incomes decreased for all households except for those households at the top.

WORST: Major Stock Indices had Worst Quarter since 1987.
In the third quarter of 2002, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 had their worst quarterly performances since the fourth quarter of 1987.

WORST: Dow Jones had its Worst September since Great Depression.
September 2002 was the worst September for the Dow Jones Industrial Average since 1937 when the country was in the midst of the Great Depression. The Dow fell 12.4% in September 2002.


WORST: State Budget Crisis Worst Since World War II.
According to the National Governors Association, states are “facing the most dire fiscal situation since World War II.” The report found that “many states have exhausted budget cuts and drawing down rainy-day funds and that the most difficult decisions still lay ahead.

WORST: Seven of Worst Bankruptcies in U.S. History Occurred Under Bush.
Seven of the largest dozen bankruptcies in U.S. history occurred in 2001 and 2002. After Enron collapsed in 2001, WorldCom became the largest bankruptcy in history in 2001 based on assets. Five other companies have also filed bankruptcies that ranked in the top 12 in U.S. history.

WORST: Record Number of Publicly Traded Companies had to Restate Earnings in 2002.
A record 330 publicly traded companies had to restate their earnings in 2002 in the wake of the corporate responsibility scandals triggered by Enron. The 330 corporate earnings restatements in 2002 broke the previous record of 270 set in 2001.

WORST: Lowest Consumer Confidence in Nine Years.
Consumer confidence hit a nine-year low in October 2002 and has hovered that low ever since. In October, the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index bottomed out at 79.6. By December 2002, the index stood at just 80.3.

tgone
02-07-2003, 12:11 PM
Have you seen the bumper sticker that says"

"Re-elect Gore - 2004"

he he :)

S...
02-07-2003, 12:12 PM
Originally posted by tgone
Have you seen the bumper sticker that says"

"Re-elect Gore - 2004"

he he :)

No, but thats pretty damn funny.

gunther b
02-07-2003, 02:40 PM
fuck bush and fuck gore, we need a real leader. not a sorry ass puppet or a war machine.

verbal kint
02-10-2003, 12:46 PM
i have to agree with gunther b on that one. i would definitely not like to see a gore and bush matchup again. gore's decision to not run was probably the smartest thing he could have done, especially since the 2000 election had to have two of the worst choices for selecting a president. i dislike bush as much as the next guy, but i dont think gore could have done anything much different, especially since the two were pretty much one in the same.

they should open up the choices more and allow the other candidates to speak. nader was the best candidate for 2000.

but in 2004 it will have to be PSC 4 President.

Ojay
02-10-2003, 01:04 PM
this may be a little off.. but i know a lot of you are pretty well informed in terms of politics, conspiracies, history, etc.. Do any of you think that the US Government will ever actually change it's basic way of doing things? Will there really be a time when there is no President.. or if there still was one, would his/her powers and roles be drastically changed? Will there ever be a so-called revolution? I mean a real one, like back in '76. not some pseudo-racial-spiritual-sexual of-the-mind revolution.. but like a real overthrow of the government by the people for the people? i think it's possible, but it's also just as possible for that new form of government to be just as, if not even more, fucked up than our current government. it's all so confusing when you take everything into consideration, it just makes me wanna get high (like really really high) and say "fuck it!" and just lay there until i die.

tommyknokas
02-10-2003, 01:28 PM
no there will never be a revolution cause no one would be able to agree on what they want it would just turn into a civil war

Blue
02-10-2003, 01:30 PM
I think it's possible but not probable that there will be a revolution by the people. In order for it to become probable we first must hit rock bottom - things have to get worse, much worse, before they get better. I'd love to see a revolution, but the way things stand currently everyone is too comfortable. Plus, there's not something common to everyone that we can rally around to bring about real change. We have 100s or 1000s of little groups, all focusing on a very small part of the picture, trying the change one little thing. If they suceed there won't be real change, just something fairly superficial. If there's something that EVERYONE can get behind, only then will real change come about. So, everyone, go home and figure out what ONE thing will unite the people, not the fat cats - but don't exclude them either - but the people who make up the foundation of this country. Figure that out and then find someone with charisma, intelligence and integrity (not PSC!) who will be the figurehead of the revolution.

amanda
02-10-2003, 04:59 PM
Originally posted by Ojay revilO
this may be a little off.. but i know a lot of you are pretty well informed in terms of politics, conspiracies, history, etc.. Do any of you think that the US Government will ever actually change it's basic way of doing things? Will there really be a time when there is no President.. or if there still was one, would his/her powers and roles be drastically changed? Will there ever be a so-called revolution? I mean a real one, like back in '76. not some pseudo-racial-spiritual-sexual of-the-mind revolution.. but like a real overthrow of the government by the people for the people? i think it's possible, but it's also just as possible for that new form of government to be just as, if not even more, fucked up than our current government. it's all so confusing when you take everything into consideration, it just makes me wanna get high (like really really high) and say "fuck it!" and just lay there until i die.

do you think, in your lifetime, you will ever see a black president or a woman president? i think that is more likely to happen than a revolution.

tgone
02-10-2003, 05:50 PM
Originally posted by amanda
do you think, in your lifetime, you will ever see a black president or a woman president? i think that is more likely to happen than a revolution.

I agree. Rev. Sharpton is running for prez 2004. Does anyone know if this is the first black candidate? Also, Mrs. Clinton may run I think.

verbal kint
02-10-2003, 08:59 PM
Originally posted by tgone
I agree. Rev. Sharpton is running for prez 2004. Does anyone know if this is the first black candidate? Also, Mrs. Clinton may run I think.

actually, if i am correct, i believe jesse jackson ran for president a while back, but probably lost during the primaries. i'm not all too sure though, since it was before my time, or before i had the ability to comprehend anything. and if you actually look at ALL the people who run as presidential candidates, you would see many black and female people who had ran for president. as for hillary clinton, fuck her, and her superficial reasons for running for president.

but dont anybody forget, PSC 4 Pres.!

Ojay
02-11-2003, 07:02 AM
I'm sure I'll see either a female or black president (or both) within my lifetime. Whether this will actually mean something remains to be seen. What I mean by that is.. when the powers that be have a reason to allow a woman or a black man or woman (or someone else that doesn't fit into any of these categories - like me) in that position.. it will be for a reason. I understand that it means a lot to many people that this happens for many reasons..and it would be a dream come true to these people..i'm just afraid that no matter who holds the office, they'll never do a good enough job to please the country due to the limitations of that office. the masses are as quick to hang a leader as they were to put that leader on a pedestal.